For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Since the new Law on Mandatory Mental Healthcare (Wvggz) entered into force, the legal and ethical discussion regarding the prevention of irresponsible parenthood has been rekindled. Together with co-author Cathrijn van Vleuten, Hannah van Kolfschooten wrote an article on this debate.

In their article, the authors discuss the distinctive legal verdicts that have been given regarding the (im)possibilities of imposing compulsory birth control under the Wvggz. They question the statement that the Wvggz provides more opportunities to impose compulsory birth control on vulnerable women in light of the protection of children’s rights. In addition, they doubt whether the Wvggz truly offers a sound legal basis for the restriction of reproductive rights of women in the mandatory healthcare system.

This article was published in Nederlands Juristenblad (10/2022).

Mr. H.B. (Hannah) van Kolfschooten LLM

Faculty of Law

Gezondheidsrecht