For best experience please turn on javascript and use a modern browser!
You are using a browser that is no longer supported by Microsoft. Please upgrade your browser. The site may not present itself correctly if you continue browsing.
Prof. Johan Legemaate argues that the medical disciplinary judicial body should limit the grounds that allow for a complaint. This will improve the functioning and effectiveness of the medical disciplinary judicial bodies.

The purpose of medical disciplinary law is to preserve and improve the quality of healthcare. However, the judicial bodies that oversee the medical professions have been struggeling for some time now with so-called ‘trifling complaints’: complaints that bear little to no relation to the quality of the provided healthcare, are therefore no addition to quality control and improvement of healthcare. According to Prof. Johan Legemaate, the amount of trifling complaints can be reduced by limiting the legal grounds for complaints.

Prof. J. (Johan) Legemaate

Faculty of Law

Gezondheidsrecht